FInal crit feedback.

Comment on the extent to which the work presented a clear approach to the research development and resolution of a personal response to the brief. 
good

look at grading criteria for boards e.g. logo development & chosen logo. considerations.

Comment on the extent to which the work presented/proposed demonstrates a critical approach to the investigation of content, audience & context.  Has this been informed by appropriate levels of contextual research. 
good

-Who is your audience?
distribution?
where will this be seen? (context)
(Freebee with an existing magazine)
Need to show on boards.
This set would not be effective at bringing in new people to skateboarding, would be useful for those already interested in it. (due to the language)

comment on the appropriateness of the range of products/proposals with regards to their effective and innovative use of print processes, techniques and formats.
good > very good
Good information & layout.
Have you tried making the book impossible to read?
What does a finished board look like inc the deck, trucks & wheels.
fold out poster shaped like a skateboard?


Additional comments
put what your good is onto boards. 
deconstruct the book to make it hard to read or navigate (consider)